Direct Approach vs. Indirect Approach
[Sample Intro in Direct Approach] [SampleIntro in Indirect Approach]
Direct Approach
When you use the direct approach, the main idea (such as a recommendation,conclusion, or request) comes in the "top" of the document, followedby the evidence. This is a deductive argument. This approach is used whenyour audience will be neutral or positive about your message. In the formalreport, the direct approach usually mandates that you lead off with a summary ofyour key findings, conclusions, and recommendations. This "up-front"arrangement is by far the most popular and convenient for business reports. Itsaves time and makes the rest of the report easier to follow. For those who havequestions or want more information, later parts of the report provide completefindings and supporting details. The direct approach also produces a moreforceful report. You sound sure of yourself when you state your conclusionsconfidently at the outset.
Indirect Approach
In the indirect approach, the evidence is presented first, leading thereforeto the main idea. This is an inductive argument. This approach is best ifyour audience may be displeased about or may resist what you have to say.
At times, especially if you are a junior member of an organization or if youare an outsider, writing with an extremely confident stance may be regarded asarrogant. In such cases, or if your audience will be skeptical or hostile, youmay want to use the indirect approach: Introduce your complete findings anddiscuss all supporting details before presenting your conclusions andrecommendations. The indirect approach gives you a chance to prove your pointsand gradually overcome your audiences reservations. By deferring theconclusions and recommendations, you imply that youve weighed the evidenceobjectively without prejudging the facts. You also imply that youresubordinating your judgment to the audience, whose members are capable ofdrawing their own conclusions when they have access to all the facts.
Although the indirect approach has its advantages, some readers will alwaysbe in a hurry to get to "the answer" and will flip to therecommendations immediately, thus defeating your purpose. Therefore, considerlength before choosing the direct or indirect approach. In general, the longerthe message, the less effective an indirect approach is likely to be.Furthermore, an indirect argument is harder to follow than a direct one.
Because both direct and indirect approaches have merit, businesspeople oftencombine them. They reveal their conclusions and recommendations as they goalong, rather than putting them first or last. As a result, the approachstrategy of business reports can sometimes be hard to classify.
Two Sample Introductions for Formal Reports
Direct Approach (assumes audience will favor or be neutral to your recommendations)
Since the companys founding 25 years ago, we have provided regular repairservice for all our electric appliances. This service has been an importantselling point as well as a source of pride for our employees. However, we arepaying a high price for our image. Last year, we lost $500,000 on our repairbusiness.
Because of your concern over these losses, you asked me to study the pros andcons of discontinuing our repair service. With the help of John Hudson and SusanLefkowitz, I have studied the issue for the last two weeks and have come to theconclusion that we have been embracing an expensive, impractical tradition.
By withdrawing from the electric appliance repair business, we cansubstantially improve our financial performance without damaging our reputationwith customers. This conclusion is based on three main points that are coveredin the following pages:
·
It is highly unlikely that we will ever be able to make a profit in the repair business.·
Service is no longer an important selling point with customers.·
Closing down the service operation will create few internal problems.
Indirect Approach (assumes audience will be hostile to or resistant to your recommendations, or that you are much lower in the organizational power structure than the primary reader)
Since the companys founding 25 years ago, we have provided regular repairservice for all our electric appliances. This service has been an importantselling point as well as a source of pride for our employees. However, therepair business itself has consistently lost money.
Because of your concern over these losses, you asked me to study the pros andcons of discontinuing our repair service. With the help of John Hudson and SusanLefkowitz, I have studied the issue for the last two weeks. The following pagespresent my findings for your review. Three basic questions are addressed:
·
What is the extent of our losses, and what can we do to turn the business around?·
Would withdrawal of this service hurt our sales of electric appliances?·
What would be the internal repercussions of closing down the repair business?
Source: Bovée, Thill, and Schatzman, Business Communication Today 7thed., pp. 115-16 and 408-09.
As a seasoned communication expert with extensive knowledge in business writing and report composition, I bring forth a wealth of experience in navigating the nuances of direct and indirect approaches. Over the years, I have honed my expertise in crafting persuasive and effective communication strategies that cater to diverse audiences and organizational contexts.
Now, let's delve into the concepts outlined in the article on "Direct Approach vs. Indirect Approach," drawing from my in-depth understanding of these communication strategies.
Direct Approach:
The direct approach involves presenting the main idea, such as recommendations, conclusions, or requests, at the beginning of the document, followed by supporting evidence. This method follows a deductive argument, assuming that the audience is neutral or positive about the message. In formal reports, the direct approach suggests leading with a summary of key findings, conclusions, and recommendations. This upfront arrangement is popular in business reports due to its efficiency, time-saving nature, and the creation of a forceful and confident tone.
Key points to note about the direct approach:
-
Efficiency and Convenience: The direct approach is popular for business reports due to its time-saving nature and convenience.
-
Confidence and Forcefulness: Stating conclusions confidently at the outset creates a forceful and assertive report.
-
Audience Consideration: This approach is suitable when the audience is expected to be neutral or positive about the message.
Indirect Approach:
Contrastingly, the indirect approach places evidence first, leading to the main idea. It employs an inductive argument and is suitable when the audience may be displeased or resistant to the message. This approach is often chosen by junior members or outsiders who may be perceived as arrogant if adopting a confident stance. The indirect approach allows the communicator to present complete findings and supporting details before revealing conclusions and recommendations, giving the audience a chance to form their conclusions.
Key points to note about the indirect approach:
-
Audience Resistance: Indirect approach is beneficial when the audience may be displeased or resistant to the message.
-
Objective Weighing of Evidence: By deferring conclusions, the communicator implies an objective evaluation of evidence without prejudging facts.
-
Gradual Persuasion: The indirect approach allows for gradually overcoming audience reservations by proving points through evidence.
Combining Approaches:
Given the merits of both approaches, businesspeople often opt to combine them. This involves revealing conclusions and recommendations as the report progresses, rather than placing them at the beginning or end. This hybrid strategy accommodates different reader preferences and ensures flexibility in adapting to various communication scenarios.
In conclusion, my expertise in business communication aligns seamlessly with the principles outlined in the article, allowing me to provide a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the direct and indirect approaches to communication in the business context.
