Linus Geisler - Doctor and patient [3]: The correct distance. Correct seating. (2024)

The correct distance

The physical distancebetween the doctor and patient should be correct when a doctor and patienttalk. If this is not the case, a feeling of uneasiness can arise, whichcan lead to a serious disturbance of the discussion.

The phenomenon is based uponthe fact that there are distances between people in the differenttypes of communicative situations, which are felt unconsciously, by tacitunderstanding, to be appropriate. These distances depend on cultural group,nationality and race, social level, sex, and age as well as psychologicalmakeup. Everybody has his "personal space", which is nevertheless verysimilar over a hom*ogeneous group of people. If this distance is changed,either encroached upon or elongated, major disorders of communicationcan result. There is always a symbolic meaning to the distance betweenpeople, and this counts as one of the non-verbal means of expression. Themost successful discussions between doctor and patient depend on doctorand patient finding each other at a distance that both unconsciously perceiveas correct.

top

How much room doesa person need?

Julius Fast, one of the majorauthorities on body language, described an event which turned out to bea major lesson in body language. Fast was sitting at a table with a psychiatristwho was a friend of his. They were eating lunch in a restaurant oppositeeach other at a table for two. His friend took a packet of cigarettes fromhis pocket, lit one and laid the packet just in front of Fast's place settingwhile continuing to talk. Fast found that he was uncomfortable, but wasunable to define this in more detail. This uneasiness increased as thefriend pushed his place setting toward the packet of cigarettes. When thefriend then leant over the table directly towards Fast, the latter feltso irritated, that he had to interrupt the conversation. Then his partnerleant back and said smiling: "I have demonstrated to you a basic fact ofbody language. Initially I pushed my cigarette packet towards you. We hadalready divided the table into two, on the basis of established convention;one half for me and the other for you. In imagination, we had marked ourrespective territories. Normally we should have politely divided the tableinto two and respected the other's half. I put my cigarettes deliberatelyinto your half, and thereby broke the agreement. Although you did not knowwhat I was doing, you felt uneasy. When I made another move into your territory,pushing my plate and cutlery forward, and then leant forwards myself, youwere feeling more and more uncomfortable and threatened, but you stilldid not know why".

What Fast is describing isthe classical reaction to a threat to one's territory or movementinto the personal space of the individual. Studies of the specific spacerequirements of people, and the optimal distance in certain particularcommunicative circ*mstances, have become a new science, called proximately.E.T. Hall, an anthropologist, has described the most important facts aboutthepersonal space between people. Hall differentiates between 4distancezones, within which most people communicate.

1. The intimate distance
2. The personal distance
3. The social/business distance
4. The public speaking distance

Description of the existenceof these 4 distance zones has been a helpful explanation for the reasonswhy people find certain distances between each other or a group eithercorrect or disturbing (table).

Distances in the 4 proximetryzones (according to R.H. RUHLEDER)
-

more introvertedperson

more extrovertedperson

stranger

Intimate distance

0,40 m - 1,50m

0,30 m - 0,50m

up to 0,50 m

Personal distance

1,50 m - 2,00m

0,40 m - 1,50m

0,50 m - 1,50m

Social/businessdistance

2,00 m - 4,00m

1,50 m - 3,00m

1,50 m - 3,00m

Public speakingdistance

from 4,00 m

from 3,00 m

from 3,00 m

As can be seen, the distancezones are greater, the less one trusts the other person. The existenceof these sorts of distance zones explains why we have the urgent desireto get out of a full lift, and why both teachers and students find a distanceof 4 m between them as right, as well as why it is normal that 2 men inArabic countries walk one with his arm around the other, which would immediatelyarouse surprise if seen in Hamburg. This also explains why Charlemagneerected his throne in the Cathedral of Aix-la-Chapelle as high as he did(in order that nobody from Rome could sit higher than him). The followingrulesforcorrect distances apply to West Europeans.

Intimate distance

The close intimate distanceis the accepted physical distance between two dose friends, lovers, childrenand their parents, as well as between married couples. In Western societies,the dose intimate distance between women is accepted in society, whereasit is not between men. The dose intimate distance is normal for Arab menand for people in some south European countries.

Linus Geisler - Doctor and patient [3]: The correct distance. Correct seating. (2)
Proximetry zones forthose who do not know each other well (acc. to R.H. RUHLEDER)

Men who do not know eachother well experience the wider intimate proximity zone as painfuland react with uncertainty and restlessness. When they are in the intimatedistance zone, it is only possible for them to exchange a brief, neutraleye contact. Any eye contact which lasts more than 3 seconds is perceivedas intrusion or pressurization; it creates the impression of being staredat, and can lead to aggressive reactions.

If it happens that peoplewho do not know each other find that they have been forced into the doseintimate distance (lift, crowded public transport, crowded public places)restlessness and aggression can be observed. Fighting in football stadiumsis probably due to the crowding that forces people into dose proximity.

The personal distance

People still can shake handsin the closer personal distance. It is the typical distance seenat co*cktail parties or between married couples in public.

The wider personal distanceis the limit of the personal area of domination. This is the distance thatpeople usually take up when they meet unexpectedly (i.e. in the street)and attempt conversation about things that are not particularly private.The message that this distancing gives is one of being preparedfor open and neutral conversation. This is the distance (90 to 150cm) which doctors and patients should use in discussion with one another.This is also the distance which has been shown to be most convenient fordiscussions whilst sitting. This also applies to the situation in whichthe doctor is in discussion with patients who are in bed. When ward roundstake place at the foot of the bed, the doctor is already out of the personaldistance and has entered the so-called "business" distance, which is nolonger appropriate for confidential discussion. Most of the technical,non-invasive and invasive investigations (ultrasound, endoscopy, catheterization)are carried out in the personal distance. A patient who is expected tosit 3 m away from his doctor, discovers that he has major problems in communicating,similar to those experienced by a patient encased in a computer tomographwho cannot see a doctor close at hand.

The social/businessdistance

This more distant portionof the business distance is used for official social or business functions.It is protective to a certain extent. Continual eye-contact is expectedat this distance.

The person who is speakinginterprets fleeting eye contact from the person to whom he is speakingas inattention. When a person in authority wants to be critical, he mayuse the social/business distance instead of the personal distance. Thewider social distance also gives the possibility of politely indicatingthat one does not wish to communicate; for instance it allows the receptionistto turn from visitors who are waiting, and to continue typing.

The public speakingdistance (lecturing distance)

The teacher is most likelyto be at a close public speaking distance (4 to 8 m) from pupils, as isthe manager who is lecturing his workers, or speaking to a group that hewishes to keep within view. This is the necessary distance for a speakerwho needs to keep all of his audience in his visual field.

Interestingly, certain sortsof animals keep to the dose public distance, and will only come as doseor as near as this. If the person approaches them, they will either retreat,flee or attack. This characteristic is used by the lion-trainer; he movesdirectly towards the lion and as soon as he is between 4 and 6 m away,the lion backs until it reaches the railings of the cage. If the tamerwere to go nearer, the lion would attack him. The trainer takes advantageof the situation and places a stool for the lion between him and it. Theshortest way for the lion to get at the trainer is to climb onto the stool.As he is doing this, the trainer is able to escape from the public distanceand has the lion where he wanted him.

The need for space andits interpretation are to a certain extent completely different invarious cultures. For example Japanese tend to huddle together into thesmallest space possible, a characteristic which can be studied in a groupof tourists. It is interesting that there is no Japanese equivalent forthe term "personal space". Arabs also love to get dose together, and theyfind it very strange that Europeans, especially Germans, have such relativelylarge private spheres. Arabs prefer considerable closeness, crush and physicalproximity; this specific proximity contributes to a considerable extentto the flair of the oriental bazaar. The "unfriendly behaviour" of theNew Yorkers in their completely overpopulated city, probably has not todo so much with unfriendliness as with a need to maintain their privatesphere so that they ignore others in the subways and the streets.

Maintaining a certain distanceto others has the character of a non-verbal message. Its preconditionis that the other person has the same need for space. If this is not thecase, misunderstandings are very likely to arise rapidly. The appropriatedistance between strangers in Mediterranean and South American countriesis much less than in West Europe, or North America. The Greek or Turk,who wants to speak to a French person or a German, will take up a positionwhich is nearer to the other than when 2 Germans or Frenchmen speak toone another. A German who in spoken to by a Turk, can soon get a strongfeeling of intrusion, and unconsciously move backwards in order to takeup the correct distance. This backward step could then be taken as a disparagingor evasive non-verbal signal.

top

Correct seating

Most discussions between doctorsand patients are carried out while both are seated. Discussionscarried out while standing, on the corridor or by the open door shouldbe avoided whenever possible. Usually doctors stand within the so-calleddistant "personal space" of the bed. In order to achieve a more favourablediscussion, it is better to sit at the bedside (this is also less tiringfor the doctor). It also eliminates the unfavourable height differencesbetween the person who is standing and the other who is sitting or lying,and lessens this external symbol of asymmetry. Both partners find themselvesin the business zone if discussions are initiated from the foot of thebed. Sitting is very conducive to the climate of discussion. Samy Molcho,the pantomimes, describes sitting as "an ideal position for communicativeexchange". According to him: "Sitting is a physical stance which leadsto relaxation and unburdening of the organism... the body is in a conditionwhere it can carry out a wide range of activities including gesticulationand gestures without a continuous tension in all of the muscles. This includesgiving most of the signals which are used in the code of social understanding."When seated, both partners have taken up a fixed position in space whichhas significance for their relationship during the discussion. The spatialdistance between the two is also an expression of their personal distance.This also has an effect on the loudness of speech, the possibility of watchingone another, and the sorts of eye contact. The "seating code" that is selectedhas a symbolic character, as it is usually chosen mutually. The heightof the seats should be the same. A feeling of inferiority can arisein a person who is invited to sit in a deep armchair by someone sittingat a table. The optimal conversation distance is between 90 and150 cm. This is the distance that can be bridged by a hand-shake. It isalso suitable for discussion about difficult or awkward subjects withoutthe danger of having to speak so loudly that the conversation can be overheardby somebody nearby. This does not apply to discussions involving severalpeople (i.e. relatives) in which case the business distance (2-3 m)is preferable.

If the discussion takes placeover a table, this should not be wider than 80-100 cm. There are however2 seating positions which can be used for doctor-patient discussions:vis à vis and sitting to the side (see illustration).

Linus Geisler - Doctor and patient [3]: The correct distance. Correct seating. (4)
Seated face to face

Linus Geisler - Doctor and patient [3]: The correct distance. Correct seating. (5)
Seated over the cornerof a desk

Sitting face to face demonstratesthat one is fully devoted to the other person and completely concentratingon him alone. However, this is not always pleasant for some people, whoinstead experience feelings of direct confrontation with the other. Thisis the reason why this position is used by civil servants to "get the publicunder". Barriers can be created by papers, files, pens or x-ray films.Sitting opposite is the typical form of seating for "legal discussions".

"Sitting over a corner"(at an angle between 90 and 150 degrees) has some advantages. It avoidsthe occasionally unavoidable "frontal attack" character of sitting faceto face. The variability of the angle gives both partners room to moveand a certain flexibility. This sort of "oblique desk" situation (overthe left corner of the desk) allows the person leading the discussion tomake notes and to look at records without having to hold them up or laythem down between himself and the patient. It is also easier to introducepauses in the discussion. Changes in position of either partner are notexperienced as intensely by the other as they would be face to face. Finallythe distance between the two can be varied more easily, although this shouldnot be out of the 90-150 cm range. Larger distances would be interpretedas "keeping one's distance", and lack of concern; but a shorter distancecan be interpreted as an intrusion into the personal space, and releaserestlessness or aggression.

There are doctors who liketo sit at the same side of the desk as their patients. This seating arrangementexpresses the desire that there is no asymmetry between doctor and patient.Many patients may appreciate this, but the disadvantage is that the doctorcan hardly make any notes, and that some patients find that sitting nextto the doctor is an encroachment on their intimate space.

top

Posture whilst sitting

Posture is part of body languageand thereby also a part of the discussion. The way in which a person sitsallows interpretation of his immediate mood, his internal disposition,his nature and his attitude towards the other. S. Molcho analyzed the meaningof the expression of posture as follows:

•Postureof the trunk: Erect, alert posture signals dynamism and vitality asopposed to slumping with its connotations of lack of drive and possibledepressive mood. Leaning of the upper part of the body towards the otherreflects interest in the other and invites dialogue; leaning back impliesskepticism, withdrawal or avoidance. This means that body languageand words can contradict each other. Someone who agrees verballybut leans backwards is distancing himself from his words. In case of doubt,apply the rule that the body does not lie.
•Careful positioning onthe edge of the chair signals time pressure or jumpiness. It can alsobe a sign of inferiority or uncertainty, as well as a desire to end theconversation. Exaggerated leaning backwards, even to the point ofbalancing on the hind-legs of the chair, reveals a retreat to the roleof observer, who is watching and waiting. Getting up briefly or shiftingin the seat is an indication of unease and a non-verbal signal that hewould like to leave.
•The position of the legswhilst sitting can also be an important signal. If the feet are lockedtogether at the ankle, this can imply reserve, internal tension and danger.If the feet wind themselves round the chair-legs, the position that hasbeen taken up is rigid and not easy to change, whereas loosely crossedlegs speak for openness with some degree of reserve. An open relaxed positionwith outstretched legs demonstrates trust, but also territorial claims,but a wide seat with shins set obliquely indicates a protective barrier.If two people sit cross-legged next to each other with toes pointing towardseach other, contact is being sought between them. However differences anddistancing are indicated by toes of the two people pointed away from eachother.
•The upright position withclosed knees and feet, perhaps with a bag tightly clenched in the lap,is more often seen in women, where this stance is a sign of being "broughtup correctly" although inhibition, uncertainty and anxieties lie behindit.

However when interpretingbody language, it must be remembered that although these rules mayapply to some, they cannot be applied to everybody. All rigid "that meansthat" rules can lead to incorrect interpretations. There must be a synchronousappreciation and analysis of verbal and non-verbal forms of communicationbefore it can really be understood what messages the conversation partneris actually giving (see chapter on Body Language).

top
previous page
next page

LinusGeisler: Doctor and patient - a partnership through dialogue
©Pharma Verlag Frankfurt/Germany, 1991
URLof this page: http://www.linus-geisler.de/dp/dp03_distance.html
Linus Geisler - Doctor and patient [3]: The correct distance. Correct seating. (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Eusebia Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5837

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Eusebia Nader

Birthday: 1994-11-11

Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

Phone: +2316203969400

Job: International Farming Consultant

Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.