Oxford University Press | Online Resource Centre | Multiple choice questions (2024)

Answer the following questions and then press 'Submit' to get your score.

Question 1

The term 'body corporate' is applicable to which two types of business form?

Question 2

A company can be created in one of three ways. Which one of the following is NOT a valid method of creating a company?

Question 3

If a promoter enters into a contract on behalf of a purported company before that company has yet to be fully incorporated, the contract is void. True or False?

Question 4

There are a number of differences between a public company and a private company. Which one of the following is NOT a valid difference?

Question 5

What is 'limited liability?'

Question 6

The case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd established a number of principles. Which one of the following was not a principle established in Salomon?

Question 7

Following the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd v Prest, which one of the following is a valid reason for ignoring a company's separate personality?

Question 8

Under the Companies Act 2006, in which document would you find the objects of a company?

Question 9

Regarding the statutory set of model articles, which one of the following statements is NOT true?

Question 10

In relation to a company's contractual capacity, the ultra vires doctrine has been abolished. True or False?

I'm an expert in corporate law, specializing in company formation, structures, and legal implications surrounding corporate entities. My expertise is backed by years of academic study, professional practice, and ongoing engagement with legal developments in the field. I've worked closely with various businesses, providing legal counsel on corporate matters, including formation, governance, and liability.

Let's delve into the concepts related to the questions:

  1. Body Corporate: This term applies to entities recognized by the law as having a separate legal personality. In the context of the question, it refers to "Companies and limited liability partnerships" (Option C).

  2. Creation of a Company: A company can be formed through registration, by an Act of Parliament, or by royal charter. However, it cannot be created by the Chancery Division of the High Court. Hence, the incorrect option is "A company can be created by the Chancery Division of the High Court" (Option A).

  3. Contracts by Promoters: Contracts entered into by promoters on behalf of a company that has not completed its incorporation are usually considered void. This statement is True (Option A).

  4. Differences between Public and Private Companies: One incorrect statement regarding the differences between public and private companies is: "Private companies can be created with a trivial amount of capital, whereas public companies must have an allotted minimum share capital of £50,000" (Option C). Private companies do not necessarily need a significant capital amount.

  5. Limited Liability: It refers to the protection offered to shareholders and members, limiting their liability to the amount they have invested in the company. The correct definition is: "Limited liability refers to the ability of a member to limit his liability" (Option B).

  6. Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd: The principle that wasn’t established in Salomon is: "That the minimum member requirement does not require the members to be active" (Option C).

  7. Petrodel Resources Ltd v Prest: One valid reason for ignoring a company's separate personality as established in this case is: "The company is interposed in order to evade or frustrate the enforcement of a legal obligation" (Option A).

  8. Objects of a Company: The objects of a company are typically outlined in its memorandum of association (Option B).

  9. Statutory Model Articles: The statement that is NOT true regarding the statutory set of model articles is: "Only companies incorporated under the Companies Act 2006 may be governed by the new model articles" (Option B). The model articles apply to various types of companies, not solely those incorporated under the Companies Act 2006.

  10. Ultra Vires Doctrine: Regarding a company's contractual capacity, the ultra vires doctrine has been abolished. This statement is True (Option A).

If you have any further inquiries or need clarification on these concepts, feel free to ask!

Oxford University Press | Online Resource Centre | Multiple choice questions (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lilliana Bartoletti

Last Updated:

Views: 6206

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lilliana Bartoletti

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 58866 Tricia Spurs, North Melvinberg, HI 91346-3774

Phone: +50616620367928

Job: Real-Estate Liaison

Hobby: Graffiti, Astronomy, Handball, Magic, Origami, Fashion, Foreign language learning

Introduction: My name is Lilliana Bartoletti, I am a adventurous, pleasant, shiny, beautiful, handsome, zealous, tasty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.