Table 3 (2024)

Table 3

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Table 3 presents selected derived measures of natality for as many years as possible between 1980 and 1999. These measures are the child-woman ratio, the total fertility rate and the gross and net reproduction rates.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Description of variables: The child-woman ratio is the number of children under five-years of age per 1 000 women aged 15-49 at a given moment of time. Because the computation of this ratio only requires census-type data on the population by age and sex, it provides an index of fertility when reliable birth statistics are not available.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The child-woman ratio may be thought of as an indicator of recent fertility net of child mortality. The child-woman ratio is, in effect, the number of surviving births from the five years prior to the reference date, often the time of a population census, per 1 000 women of reproductive age, regardless of marital status, alive at the reference date. Because the denominator of this ratio is limited to females and, in particular, to females of reproductive age (that is, women aged 15-49), the child-women ratio is particularly standardized for variation in the age and sex composition of the population. In this respect it differs from the crude birth rate that is particularly sensitive to variations in distribution of the population by age and sex.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The total fertility rate is the average number of children that would be born alive to hypothetical cohort of women if, throughout their reproductive years, the age-specific fertility rates for the specified year remain unchanged. The total fertility rate is the sum of the age-specific fertility rates per woman. The structure of the population does not affect the total fertility rate because each age group is weighted equally.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The gross reproduction rate is the average number of daughters that would be born alive to a hypothetical cohort of women if they lived to the end of their reproductive years and if they experienced the some age-specific fertility throughout their lives that women in each age group experience in a given year or period of years. Although the gross reproduction rate purports to describe the fertility experience of a generation of women, the rates presented in this table are actually based on the fertility reported or estimated for a given reference period, usually a single year or a five-year period.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The gross reproduction rate is not affected by the age structure of the population because it is, in effect, an age-standardized fertility rate with each age given a weight of one. In addition, it can also be thought of as the ratio between female births in two successive generations assuming that there are no deaths before the end of the reproductive period, or it may be considered as the ratio between the number of females in one generation at a given age and the number of their daughters at the same age, assuming that there is no mortality during the child-bearing years.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

In a female population unaffected by mortality and migration, and assuming the age-specific fertility rates of the reference period do not change, a gross reproduction rate of one indicates exact replacement, a rate of less than one indicates that the population is not replacing itself while a rate of more than one means that the population is more than replacing itself. Because of the impact of mortality, gross reproduction rates somewhat in excess of one are needed to achieve replacement.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The net reproduction rate is the average number of daughters that would be born alive to a hypothetical cohort of women if they experienced the same age-specific fertility throughout their lives that women in each age group experienced in a given year, or period of years, and if they were also subjected to the mortality rates of the same year or period of years. Although the net reproduction rate purports to describe the fertility and mortality experience of a generation of women, the rates presented in this table are actually based on the fertility and mortality reported or estimated for a given reference period, usually a single year or a five-year period.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Like the gross reproduction rate, the net reproduction rate is not affected by the age structure of the population. However, it differs from the gross reproduction rate because it takes mortality into account.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The net reproduction rate can also be thought of as the ratio between female births in two successive generations taking mortality into account, or it may be considered as the ratio between the number of females in one generation at a given age and the number of their daughters at the same age, again taking mortality into account.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

In a female population unaffected my migration and assuming the age-specific fertility and mortality rates of the reference period do not change, a net reproduction rate of one indicates exact replacement, a rate of less than one indicates that the population is not replacing itself while a rate of more than one means that the population is more than replacing itself. A net reproduction rate of one is roughly equivalent to a two-child family.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Ratio and rate computation: Child-woman ratios are the number of children of both sexes 0-4 years of age per 1 000 female population aged 15-49 years. These ratios were computed using data from population censuses or sample survey or using estimates of population by age and sex.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The child-woman ratios have been computed by the Statistics Division of the United Nations unless otherwise noted. When the basic official data with which to compute these ratios have not been available, estimates prepared by the Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat<![if !supportFootnotes]>[1]<![endif]> have been included; these are indicated by footnotes.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Child-woman ratios presented in this table have not been limited to those countries or areas having a minimum number of children under 5 years of age. However, ratios shown in this table based on 30 or fewer children under 5 years of age are identified by the symbol(♦).

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Total fertility rates are the sum of age-specific fertility rates. The standard method of computing the total fertility rate is to sum the age-specific fertility rates. However, if the rates used are fertility rates for 5-year age groups, they must be multiplied by 5. The total fertility rates have been computed by the Statistics Division of the United Nations unless otherwise noted. When the basic official data with which to compute these rates have not been available, estimates prepared by the Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat<![if !supportFootnotes]>[1]<![endif]> have been included; these are indicated by footnotes.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Total fertility rates presented in this table have not been limited to those countries or areas having a minimum number of live births in a given year. However, rates based on 30 or fewer live births shown in this table are identified by the symbol(♦).

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The gross and net reproduction rates were computed by national statistical offices.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The standard method of computing the gross reproduction rate is to sum the age-specific fertility rates for female live births. If the rates used are for other than single years of age, for example, if they are for 5-year age groups, they must be multiplied by 5. The sum of these rates is the gross reproduction rate.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

An alternative method of computing the gross reproduction rate is to multiply the total fertility rate by a factor (0.484 or 0.488 are commonly used), which approximates the proportion of female to total births.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The net reproduction rate is computed the same way as the gross reproduction rate, but with additional steps to take mortality into account. Before summing, the individual age-specific fertility rates are multiplied by the proportion of females surviving from birth to the midpoint of the corresponding age interval. These proportions can be computed using the following functions from a life table for females: (Lx/lo), lo being the radix of the table. The life table should be for the same year or period of years to which the age-specific fertility rates pertain.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

An alternative method of computing the net reproduction rate is to take the gross reproduction rate and then simply multiply it by the probability of female surviving from birth to the mean age of maternity, computed in the absence of mortality.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The gross and net reproduction rates shown in this table are based on female fertility and female fertility and mortality, respectively. It is also possible, but by no means the standard practice, to compute analogous rates for the male population. In addition, as presented here, these rates refer to a hypothetical cohort based on fertility schedules for a given year or period of years. These rates can also be computed for a real cohort, representing their fertility (and mortality).

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Gross and net reproduction rate presented in this table have not been limited to those countries or areas having a minimum number of live births in a given year.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Reliability of data: Child-woman ratios computed using estimates which are believed to be less reliable are set in italics rather than in roman type. Classification in terms of reliability is based on the method of construction of the total population estimate as shown in the regular Demographic Yearbook in the volume containing the general tables and discussed in the technical notes for the table. No attempt has been made to take account of age-reporting accuracy.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Total fertility rates computed using data from civil registers of live births that are reported as incomplete (less than 90 per cent completeness) or of unknown completeness are considered unreliable and are replaced by estimates prepared by the Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat<![if !supportFootnotes]>[1]<![endif]>. For more information about the quality of vital statistics data in general, and the information available on the basis of the completeness estimates in particular, see section 4.2 of the Technical Notes.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Limitations: Child-woman ratios shown in this table are subject to all of the same limitations that affect the data on population by age and sex from which they have been computed. Although the interpretation of child-woman ratios is usually based on the presumption that differences between countries or areas reflect differences in the rates at which births occurred to women of child-bearing age in the five years preceding the census, these ratios are strongly influenced by other factors, the most important of which are deficiencies and irregularities in the census results.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Although under enumeration at the census may occur in any age group and hence may affect both the numerator and the denominator of the ratio, it appears that in most censuses, a greater proportion of young children is omitted from the count than of older persons. The number of young children recorded in the census is also affected by the tendency to give rounded statements of age, with the result that some children under 5 may be mistakenly included among those who are 5 or over. Moreover, in countries or areas where the Chinese method of counting age is traditional, census returns will reflect the fact that infants are considered to be one year of age at birth and gain one additional year at the Chinese New Year. Adjustments can be made in these data to bring them approximately into accord with results of the Western-type question, but failing this, the child-woman ratios will tend to be understated.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The ratios shown in the table are, therefore, without doubt somewhat lower than they would be if census data on age were fully accurate. On the other hand, in countries or areas where people generally do not know their ages, it is possible that the ratios may be too high. On the whole, they are probably less deficient in the countries or areas where they are low, since many of these have good statistics. In any case, regarding countries or areas with poor census data on age (and many of the countries or areas with high ratios fall into this category), even fairly large differences in the ratios may be due mainly or entirely to deficiencies in the data.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Unlike other derived measures of fertility shown in this table, it should be remembered that the child-woman ratio is an indicator of recent fertility net of child mortality. Therefore, another factor affecting the utility of the ratios as fertility measures, is mortality. Even if the data were completely accurate, the ratios would not necessarily correspond closely to the rate at which births have occurred to women of child-bearing age in the years just before the census. The number of children under five living at a given time is the number who have survived among children born during the preceding five years. The ratios, therefore, invariably understate actual fertility levels. Furthermore, death rates at these ages vary widely from one part of the world to another. Countries or areas with high fertility tend also to be those with high child mortality.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Consequently, the ratios for such places are more affected than those places with low fertility and mortality, and the gap between those with high and those with low ratios is narrower than the gap between them in the frequency of births. However, ratios of children to women of child-bearing age are more useful for some types of analysis than rates based on births and population. If one wishes to study the rate at which the older generation is likely to be replaced by its offspring, children who die in infancy are irrelevant. From this point of view, differences in infant mortality do not affect the comparability of the ratios shown.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Although the child-woman ratio is much less affected than the crude birth rate by the age and sex structure of the population, variations in the age structure of the female population in the reproductive years can affect the international comparability of these ratios.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Total fertility rates shown in this table are subject to all the same limitations that affect the data on live births by age of mother and the data on population by age and sex from which they have been computed.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Gross and net reproduction rates shown in this table are subject to all the same limitations which affect data on live birth rates specific for age of mother and, in addition, for the net reproduction rates.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

In this connection, it should be borne in mind that the female age-specific fertility and mortality rates recorded in a given country or area at a given time do not actually represent the experience of any real generation of women, and that they may be influenced by factors which are by their nature, necessarily temporary. They are useful as a means of demonstrating the implications of fertility (and mortality) schedules pertaining to a given year or period of years assuming they were to continue unchanged.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Moreover, these rates do not take account of the fertility and mortality of the male population. There are important considerations in using gross and net reproduction rates as means of analysing the implications of observed fertility and mortality rates for future population development.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

In the absence of information to the contrary, it is assumed that rates in this table were computed by the methods described above under “Ratio and rate computation”. However, gross reproduction rates for the same countries or areas derived from the age-specific fertility rates given in table 5 may not be exactly the same as those found in this table. This is because the latter may have been computed on different estimates of the female population or they may have involved special adjustments for under-registration of birth or for treatment of births for which the age of mother was unknown.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

The accuracy of net reproduction rates is affected also by the accuracy of the life tables used. Some special questions arise in net reproduction rate computation in regard to the period of time to which the life tables relate. The life table used here is frequently the one computed from the death rates of women in the year to which the fertility rates relate, but often life tables for other years are used; in those cases, the value of a net reproduction rate is likely to fluctuate far more as a result. This procedure has been followed in this table.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Coverage: Selected derived measures of natality are shown for 224 countries or areas.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Earlier data: Selected derived measures of natality have been shown in the Demographic Yearbook: Historical Supplement and 1975, 1981 and 1986 issues. Each of the measures included in this table may also be found in earlier issues of the Demographic Yearbook as indicated in the Index.

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

<![if !supportEmptyParas]><![endif]>

Table 3 (2024)

FAQs

What is the 3 times table trick? ›

There's a clever trick you can use to find out if a number is in the 3 × table. Add up the digits of the number you want to find out about - this is called finding the digit sum. If the digit sum is 3, 6, or 9, then you know that it's in the 3 × table.

How do you remember multiples of 3? ›

The easiest way to learn the 3 times table is to remember that adding the digits of the numbers gives us the pattern of 3, 6 and then 9. Every time the pattern is repeated, we increase the tens digit by 1 and decrease the ones column by 1. For example, we have 3, 6 and 9.

What is the 3 trick in math? ›

Trick 3: Think of a number

Add 9 with result. Subtract 3 with the result. Divide the result by 2. Subtract the number with the first number started with. The answer will always be 3.

Is 95 in the 3 times table? ›

What is the table of 95? The table of 95 is the collection of values obtained from the repeated addition of 95 or the multiplication of 95 by the numbers 1, 2, 3, and so on. The multiplication table of 95 is given as: 95 × 1 = 95; 95 × 2 = 190; 95 × 3 = 285; 95 × 4 = 380; 95 × 5 = 475; 95 × 6 = 570, and so on.

Is 99 in the 3 times table? ›

Forward counting by 3's: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, …… Backward counting by 3's: ……, 75, 72, 69, 66, 63, 60, 57, 54, 51, 48, 45, 42, 39, 36, 33, 30, 27, 24, 21, 18, 15, 12, 9, 6, 3, 0.

How can I memorize tables fast? ›

Skip-counting is one of the best ways for remembering multiplication tables without simply repeating the numbers. To skip-count, you start with the number you're counting by, and continue to keep adding that same number. For example, skip-counting by 2, would be, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, etc.

Is 103 in the 3 times table? ›

Which times table has 103? 103 comes in the table of 1 and 103 only.

What times tables should a 6 year old know? ›

Year 5 and Year 6 times tables learning

Children will be expected to be really confident in all their times tables (up to the 12 times table) by the start of Year 5. During Years 5 and 6 they will become confident in multiplying larger numbers (four-digits by two-digits, for example).

What is the trick for 12 times? ›

To multiply by 12, we add a zero to the number we're going to multiply and then we add double the original number to the result.

Is 75 a multiple of 3? ›

multiple of 3: 3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,75,78,81,84,87,90,93,96,99.

Is 12 a multiple of 3? ›

The multiples of 3 are: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, …

What is a multiple of 3 called? ›

First 10 Multiples of 3: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30
9=3
12=4
21=7
36=12

Who invented math? ›

The earliest evidence of written mathematics dates back to the ancient Sumerians, who built the earliest civilization in Mesopotamia. They developed a complex system of metrology from 3000 BC.

Why does the 1089 math trick work? ›

Now, note that the first and last digits of each number add up to 9. So, when we reverse any of these numbers and add them together we get 9 lots of 100 from the first digit, 9 lots of 1 from the third and two lots of 90 from the second and so we get 900 + 9 + 180 = 1089. No mystery at all really!

IS 111 in the 3 times table? ›

Yes, by the divisibility test of 3, 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 which is a multiple of 3. Hence, 111 is divisible by 3.

IS 75 in the 3 times table? ›

Is 75 in the 3 times table? Yes, 25 times of 3 is equal to 75. As we know, the multiples of 3 include: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,…. 30, 33,…., 72, 75,…

Is 81 in the 3 times table? ›

The 81 times table up to 20 is provided below.
...
Table of 81 up to 10.
81 × 1 = 8181 × 6 = 486
81 × 3 = 24381 × 8 = 648
81 × 4 = 32481 × 9 = 729
81 × 5 = 40581 × 10 = 810
1 more row

What is the table of 999? ›

What is 999 Times Table?
999×1 = 999999
999×3 = 2997999 + 999 + 999 = 2997
999×4 = 3996999 + 999 + 999 + 999 = 3996
999×5 = 4995999 + 999 + 999 + 999 + 999 = 4995
999×6 = 5994999 + 999 + 999 + 999 + 999 + 999 = 5994
5 more rows

What is 3 times 13 riddle? ›

3(13) = 39

To explain what 3 times 13 means, look at it as 3 added together 13 times. To get the answer, you could just write down the number 3, 13 times and then add the 3 numbers together.

Does 4 tables have 100? ›

Backward counting by 4's: ……, 100, 96, 92, 88, 84, 80, 76, 72, 68, 64, 60, 56, 52, 48, 44, 40, 36, 32, 28, 24, 20, 16, 12, 8, 4, 0.

How can I memorize 10x fast? ›

6 Tips on How to Memorize Fast and Easily
  1. Understand your learning style.
  2. Learn the 3 'R's of memorization.
  3. Practice the substitution method.
  4. Learn the story and link method.
  5. Use the memory palace method.
  6. Apply spaced repetition strategically.
12 Feb 2021

What are the hardest times tables? ›

The 7 times table is the hardest to learn because 7 is a prime number, and so the final digit does not repeat itself until 10x7.

Does 14 tables have 3? ›

Knowing the table of 14 is a basic essential while learning mathematics.
...
What is the 14 Times Table?
14 × 1 = 1414 × 6 = 84
14 × 3 = 4214 × 8 = 112
14 × 4 = 5614 × 9 = 126
14 × 5 = 7014 × 10 = 140
1 more row

Does 120 tables come in 3? ›

120 is coming in the tables of 1,2,3,4,5,6 8,10,12,20, 24, 120 etc.

Does 105 come in the table of 3? ›

The 105 times table up to 20 is provided below.
...
Table of 105 up to 10.
105 × 1 = 105105 × 6 = 630
105 × 3 = 315105 × 8 = 840
105 × 4 = 420105 × 9 = 945
105 × 5 = 525105 × 10 = 1050
1 more row

How old is a year 4? ›

What to expect in Year 4 (age 8–9) at school - Oxford Owl.

How old are 2nd graders? ›

Children are usually aged 7–8 at this grade level.

How high can a 2 year old count? ›

Though every child is different, most toddlers will be able to count to 10 by the time they are two-years-old. At this point in time they are probably repeating them mostly by memory and have yet to understand what they actually mean. This concept is known as “rote” counting.

What is the 9 trick in math? ›

A Mathemagical Trick

Start by thinking of a number, any number. Now, multiply that number by 9. If the result is a multi-digit number, add its digits together to come up with a new number. If that new number is still a multi-digit number, add its digits together to come up with yet another new number.

Is 222 a multiple of 3? ›

Multiples of 222: 222, 444, 666, 888, 1110, 1332, 1554, 1776, 1998, 2220 and so on.
...
List of First 20 Multiples of 222.
222 × 1 = 222222 × 11 = 2442
222 × 3 = 666222 × 13 = 2886
222 × 4 = 888222 × 14 = 3108
222 × 5 = 1110222 × 15 = 3330
222 × 6 = 1332222 × 16 = 3552
5 more rows

Is 129 a multiple of 3? ›

Multiples of 129: 129, 258, 387, 516, 645, 774, 903, 1032, 1161, 1290 and so on.
...
List of First 20 Multiples of 129.
129 × 1 = 129129 × 11 = 1419
129 × 3 = 387129 × 13 = 1677
129 × 4 = 516129 × 14 = 1806
129 × 5 = 645129 × 15 = 1935
129 × 6 = 774129 × 16 = 2064
5 more rows

Is 180 a multiple of 3? ›

Multiples of 180: 180, 360, 540, 720, 900, 1080, 1260, 1440, 1620, 1800 and so on.
...
List of First 20 Multiples of 180.
180 × 1 = 180180 × 11 = 1980
180 × 3 = 540180 × 13 = 2340
180 × 4 = 720180 × 14 = 2520
180 × 5 = 900180 × 15 = 2700
180 × 6 = 1080180 × 16 = 2880
5 more rows

Is 3 a factor of 18? ›

The factors of 18 are 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 18.

Is 86 a multiple of 3? ›

The multiples of 86 are 86 × 1 = 86, 86 × 2 = 172, 86 × 3 = 258, 86 × 4 = 344, 86 × 5 = 430, . . . . . . . . . 86 × 12 = 1032, 86 × 13 = 1118, 86 × 14 = 1204, 86 × 15 = 1290, . . . . . . . . . and so on.

Is 26 a multiple of 3? ›

Multiples of 21 - The first five multiples of 21 are 21, 42, 63, 84, and 105.
...
Multiples of 26 from 1-10
26 × 1 = 2626 × 6 = 156
26 × 2 = 5226 × 7 = 182
26 × 3 = 7826 × 8 = 208
26 × 4 = 10426 × 9 = 234
1 more row

What is 3 as a word? ›

Therefore, 3 in words is written as Three.

Is 3 a factor of 12? ›

factor, in mathematics, a number or algebraic expression that divides another number or expression evenly—i.e., with no remainder. For example, 3 and 6 are factors of 12 because 12 ÷ 3 = 4 exactly and 12 ÷ 6 = 2 exactly. The other factors of 12 are 1, 2, 4, and 12.

Is 3 a factor of 20? ›

The factors of 20 are 1, 2, 4, 5, 10 and 20.

What is the easiest way to memorize a table? ›

Practice skip-counting

Skip-counting is one of the best ways for remembering multiplication tables without simply repeating the numbers. To skip-count, you start with the number you're counting by, and continue to keep adding that same number. For example, skip-counting by 2, would be, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, etc.

What is the easiest way to memorize the elements table? ›

1. Repetition - How to Memorize the Periodic Table Slowly
  1. Memorize chunks of five elements at a time. You'll have 23 separate groups of five to learn, with a few left over. ...
  2. Recite the element names out loud. ...
  3. Space out your learning sessions. ...
  4. Aim to overlearn.

What is the secret to memorize? ›

To memorize something quickly, repeat the information right after learning it. The second repetition should be after 15 to 20 minutes. You don't need to return to the information between repetitions. Instead, just rest and do something different to let your brain relax.

How can I memorize 30 minutes? ›

9 Steps to Learn How to Memorize Something Fast
  1. Prepare. ...
  2. Record What You're Memorizing. ...
  3. Write Everything Down. ...
  4. Section Your Notes. ...
  5. Use the Memory Palace Technique. ...
  6. Apply Repetition to Cumulative Memorization. ...
  7. Teach It to Someone. ...
  8. Listen to the Recordings Continuously.
7 Mar 2022

Why 3 is an important number? ›

Throughout human history, the number 3 has always had a unique significance, but why? The ancient Greek philosopher, Pythagoras, postulated that the meaning behind numbers was deeply significant. In their eyes the number 3 was considered as the perfect number, the number of harmony, wisdom and understanding.

Who is the youngest person to memorize the periodic table? ›

Devansh Singhal of Delhi born on August 28, 2003 has memorized the complete periodic table. He demonstrated his skills on 6thJune 2009 in NCUI Auditorium (Delhi) recalling all elements of the periodic table in 3 minutes with no error.

How to learn first 18 elements? ›

Arthur Kisses Carrie. Here He Lies Beneath Bed Clothes, Nothing On, Feeling Nervous, Naughty Margret Always Sighs, ” Please Stop Clowning Around ” (18 elements)
...
  1. Hydrogen -H.
  2. Helium -He.
  3. Lithium -Li.
  4. Beryllium -Be.
  5. Boron -B.
  6. Carbon -C.
  7. Nitrogen -N.
  8. Oxygen -O.

Is the any trick to learn periodic table? ›

Mnemonics for Periodic Table in Hindi. Science Ti(ea)cher Vineeta Criplani Man Fenko (FeCo) Ni Kyun (Cu) Zaan hai? Thode Papa Unse Napenge. Purana Aam K(C)am Bikenge.

What is the answer for 3 3 * 6 2? ›

Question: 3 – 3 x 6 + 2. Multiplication first: 3 – 18 + 2. Left to right: -15 + 2 (or Addition first: 3 – 16) Answer: -13.

How do you solve a 3 by 3 puzzle box? ›

Add the unused numbers to the open boxes in the magic square so that the rows, columns, and diagonals add up to 15. In the first row: 6 + 8 = 14, the missing number to total 15 is 1. In the third row: 2 + 4 = 6, the missing number to total 15 is 9. In the first column: 6+2 = 8, the missing number to total 15 is 7.

What does 3 3 make? ›

This means three multiplied by itself three times. The easiest way to do this calculation is to do the first multiplication (3x3) and then to multiply your answer by the same number you started with; 3 x 3 x 3 = 9 x 3 = 27.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Last Updated:

Views: 5445

Rating: 5 / 5 (70 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Birthday: 1998-01-29

Address: Apt. 611 3357 Yong Plain, West Audra, IL 70053

Phone: +5819954278378

Job: Construction Director

Hobby: Embroidery, Creative writing, Shopping, Driving, Stand-up comedy, Coffee roasting, Scrapbooking

Introduction: My name is Dr. Pierre Goyette, I am a enchanting, powerful, jolly, rich, graceful, colorful, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.