![The four categories of decision making (1) The four categories of decision making (1)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/20220916-RK-Articles-TheFourCategories-1440x560x2-SG-comp-1920x747.jpg)
Article
Business leaders and the complexity behind strategic decisions
By Philip Rosenzweig
6 min.
November 2013
PRINTABLE PDF – Less than 1MB
Decisions are a part of life and while they range in complexity, we face various decisions on a daily basis. But how can we best make decisions that lead to optimal outcomes? With an ever-growing wealth of research on the topic, decision making is being transformed into a science that can aid greatly in guiding decisions. However, undoubtedly useful in certain circ*mstances, the application of such research highly depends on the kind of decisions being made, especially in the business world.
There are clear limits and, to date, most decision making research applies to one type of decision, and it’s not the type that’s most challenging for managers. Their most important and most difficult decisions are strategic decisions with consequences for the performance of the company. Before managers take any advice on how to make better decisions, they must recognize how decisions differ.
Decisions vary along two dimensions: control and performance. Control considers how much we can influence the terms of the decision and the outcome. And performance addresses the way we measure success. Combining them creates four categories of decisions:
1] Making routine choices and judgments. When you go shopping in a supermarket or a department store, you typically pick from the products before you. Those items, perhaps a jug of milk or a jar of jam, are what they are. You have no ability to improve them. Control is low. Moreover, you make the choice that suits you best—it doesn’t matter what anyone else is buying. Performance is absolute. The same goes for most personal investment decisions. You may be able to decide which company’s shares to buy, but you can’t improve their performance after you buy them. You want high returns but aren’t trying to do better than others. The goal is to do well, not to finish first in a competition.
2] Influencing outcomes. Many decisions involve more than selecting among options we cannot improve or making judgments about things we cannot influence. In so much of life, we use our energy and talents to make things happen. Imagine that the task at hand is to determine how long we will need to complete a project. That’s a judgment we can control; indeed, it’s up to us to get the project done. Here, positive thinking matters. By believing we can do well, perhaps even holding a level of confidence that is by some definitions a bit excessive, we can often improve performance. Optimism isn’t useful in picking stocks whose performance we cannot change, but in the second field, where we have the ability to influence outcomes, it can be very important.
3] Placing competitive bets. The third category introduces a competitive dimension. Success is no longer a matter of absolute performance but depends on how well you do relative to others. The best decisions must anticipate the moves of rivals. That’s the essence of strategic thinking, which Princeton professor Avinash Dixit and Yale professor Barry Nalebuff define as “the art of outdoing an adversary, knowing that the adversary is trying to do the same to you.” Investments in stocks are typically first-field decisions, but if you’re taking part in a contest where the investor with the highest return takes the prize, you’re in the third field. Now you need to make decisions with an eye to what your rivals will do, anticipating their likely moves so that you can have the best chance of winning.
4] Making strategic decisions. In this fourth category of decision making, we can actively influence outcomes and success means doing better than rivals. Here we find the essence of strategic management. Business executives aren’t like shoppers picking a product or investors choosing a stock, simply making a choice that leads to one outcome or another. By the way they lead and communicate, and through their ability to inspire and encourage, executives can influence outcomes. That’s the definition of “management.” Moreover, they are in charge of organizations that compete vigorously with others; doing better than rivals is vital. That’s where strategy comes in.
The decisions to enter a new market, release a new product, or acquire another firm are all in the fourth field, but we can find many examples beyond business. In sports, a coach shapes the performance of athletes, melding them into an effective team that can outperform the opponent. Or in politics a winning political campaign depends on a smart assessment of rivals as well as the ability to mobilize supporters, often in the face of long odds.
The constraint of decision making research
In the course of their daily responsibilities, executives face a range of decisions, often in each of the four fields outlined here. But decision making research cannot be universally applied. When turning to research to help make better decisions, it’s critical to understand these four fields of decision making.
For first- and second-field decisions, cognitive psychologists have demonstrated that people make decisions in ways that do not conform to the tenets of economic rationality. They exhibit systematic biases, which, if surfaced, managers could use to shape routine decisions. For third-field decisions, guidance comes from the branch of economics that studies competitive dynamics: game theory. Game theory can illuminate areas from price competition to geopolitics, yet it has an important limitation: Players cannot alter the terms of the game.
So while a great deal of attention has focused on teaching executives to excel at game theory and to be aware of common biases in order to avoid their ill effects, if we apply only those lessons to the world of strategic management, we’re missing a trick.
The fourth field of decision making has a layer of complexity that doesn’t lend itself to the careful controls of laboratory experiments, so we know less about how best to make them. What sort of mind-set do they require? When we can influence outcomes, it is useful to summon high levels of self-belief. And when we need to outperform rivals, such elevated levels are not just useful but indeed essential. Only those who are able to muster a degree of commitment and determination that is by some definitions excessive will be in a position to win.
Phil Rosenzweigis professor of strategy and international development at IMD. This is an edited extract from What Makes Strategic Decisions Different, which was published in Harvard Business Review.
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Decision Making
Strategy
Browse all topics
Related topics
Decision Making
Strategy
Browse all topics
Looking for something specific?
IMD's faculty and research teams publish articles, case studies, books and reports on a wide range of topics
All articles
Keep reading
Case StudyDigital TransformationDisruptionOrganizational BehaviorStrategy
Civilia Engineering: Cultivating value through a data-driven culture
No company can grasp the potential of AI until it has set up a data-driven culture enabling employees to create value from the insights that emerge...
By José Parra-MoyanoandLisa Simone Duke
Case reference:IMD-7-2548©2024
ArticleLuxuryStrategyBranding
Why future-facing luxury brands must favor excellence over perfectionWhat does it mean to be excellent, not perfect, in 2024, and why should luxury brands weave the answer into their strategy?
By Stéphane J. G. GirodRoberto EggsandRui Meng
inI by IMD27 March 2024
![The four categories of decision making (2) The four categories of decision making (2)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/ibyimd/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/MGR_FW_2024_STMORITZEVENT_BS_RGB_300DPI_16X9_HERO-1-720x630.jpg)
Case StudyChinaBusiness to BusinessGlobal BusinessStrategy
How Fuchs drives autonomy at scale to win in a fragmented world
In a world where agility and global foresight are crucial for business survival and growth, the FUCHS case presents a compelling narrative of trans...
By Mark J. GreevenandWei Wei
Case reference:IMD-7-2539©2024
ArticleSustainabilityStrategy
Root and branch: How Lionheart Agrotech is changing agribusiness from the ground upThree lessons from a business that is pioneering an environmentally and socially sustainable approach to coconut farming.
By Benoit F. Leleux
inI by IMD19 March 2024
![The four categories of decision making (3) The four categories of decision making (3)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/ibyimd/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Lionheart-featured-image-720x630.jpg)
ArticleStrategyInnovation
Europe and Africa need an open dialogue to tackle global issues togetherAfrica’s entrepreneurial attitude towards innovation and citizen-centric solutions could help provide new answers to global issues that Europe also...
By Antonella Mei-Pochtler
inI by IMD13 March 2024
![The four categories of decision making (4) The four categories of decision making (4)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/ibyimd/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/World-720x630.jpg)
ArticleInnovationStrategy
Michelin: Digital transformation and culture – where the rubber hits the roadA crucial stage of Michelin’s digital transformation journey was re-engineering company culture. Engaging employees and shifting mindsets while res...
By Didier Bonnet
inI by IMD1 March 2024
![The four categories of decision making (5) The four categories of decision making (5)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/ibyimd/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/thisisengineering-raeng-WjOWazUPAss-unsplash-scaled.jpg)
ArticleArtificial IntelligenceBusiness EthicsValue CreationStrategy
生成AIの戦略的な活用で競争力を高める
Looking to the future and potential of generative AI (artificial intelligence), many companies are embarking on experiments and verification to int...
By Tomoko Yokoi
inHarvard Business Review JapanMarch 2024
ArticleGeneral ManagementLeadershipStrategy
The CEO exodus: The imperative of strategic succession planningAs record numbers of bosses head for the exit, early and comprehensive planning is key to navigating the complexities of CEO succession and ensurin...
By Richard Roi
inI by IMD28 February 2024
![The four categories of decision making (6) The four categories of decision making (6)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/ibyimd/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AdobeStock_319271984-720x630.jpeg)
ArticleFamily BusinessValue CreationStrategyBrandingDisruptionCrisis Management
Il brand di famiglia sotto lo stress delle crisi relazionali
Past the blanket of gossip, the recent news of Chiara Ferragni and Fedez's marriage crisis sheds light on how negative events involving celebrities...
By Alfredo De MassisandCarlotta Benedetti
inIl Sole 24 ore28 February 2024
ArticleLeadershipStrategy
Henkel’s Carsten Knobel: A CEO who sticks to his strategyHenkel CEO Carsten Knobel tells IMD President Jean-François Manzoni why he has remained laser focused on implementing its purposeful growth agenda ...
By Jean-François Manzoni
inI by IMD27 February 2024
![The four categories of decision making (7) The four categories of decision making (7)](https://i0.wp.com/www.imd.org/ibyimd/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CEODialogue-CarstenKnobel-IbyIMD-Cards-5_3-1250x725-1-720x630.jpg)
Civilia Engineering: Cultivating value through a data-driven culture
By José Parra-MoyanoandLisa Simone Duke
Case reference:IMD-7-2548©2024
Summary
No company can grasp the potential of AI until it has set up a data-driven culture enabling employees to create value from the insights that emerge from data analysis. This means that before setting up an AI strategy, organizations must transform and prepare their infrastructure and culture for the AI age. This case study discusses the initiatives developed and rolled out by Marianne Galvin, initially Head of Data Office and then VP of Digital Transformation, as she worked to turn Civilia Engineering into a data-driven company. The case explores what Marianne put in place over her first 22 months with the company. This included: Governance structures and an educational program that proved to be highly popular. As the initiatives took root, Marianne and her team began to gain acceptance of use cases and dashboards for data-driven decision making but there were still several challenges to overcome, in particular how to work with an IT team more focused on architecture and improving legacy systems. The case closes as Marianne looks ahead to 2024, outlining what still needs to be done to gain digital and data maturity. The case provides a comprehensive understanding of the critical aspects of building a data-driven organization, particularly focusing on the interplay between value, data, and people. Through this case, learners will develop a nuanced understanding of the three pillars that sustain data-driven organizations, how to create a data-centric culture, how to avoid pitfalls in data-science projects and the nuances of digital transformation in non-digital organizations. They will be equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively lead and contribute to the building of data-driven organizations, fostering an environment that embraces data-centric decision-making and successfully navigates the complexities of digital transformation in an increasingly data-driven world.
Reference IMD-7-2548
Copyright ©2024
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Civilia Engineering (Disguised)
Industry Construction and Engineering, Civil Engineering
Available Languages English
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Digital Transformation
Disruption
Organizational Behavior
Strategy
Browse all topics
Why future-facing luxury brands must favor excellence over perfection
By Stéphane J. G. GirodRoberto EggsandRui Meng
inI by IMD27 March 2024
Summary
What does it mean to be excellent, not perfect, in 2024, and why should luxury brands weave the answer into their strategy?
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Luxury
Strategy
Branding
Browse all topics
How Fuchs drives autonomy at scale to win in a fragmented world
By Mark J. GreevenandWei Wei
Case reference:IMD-7-2539©2024
Summary
In a world where agility and global foresight are crucial for business survival and growth, the FUCHS case presents a compelling narrative of transformation. This case study follows FUCHS, a leading global lubricant company, on its journey to navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing business environment while staying true to its decentralized roots. The story unfolds from the company’s humble beginnings, detailing how FUCHS has grown into a global player under the stewardship of CEO Stefan Fuchs. It emphasizes the challenges of operating in a fragmented market and the need to embrace new global forces, such as digitalization, sustainability and evolving customer expectations. The case highlights the strategic pivot FUCHS makes when it created its first ever corporate strategy, “FUCHS2025,” marking a significant shift in the company’s approach to global market dynamics. A central theme of the case is how FUCHS rethinks its matrix organization and implements agile networks. This strategic move illustrates how FUCHS balances its traditionally decentralized structure with a growing need for global integration and efficiency. The case details the intricacies of these networks, particularly focusing on HR, to show how FUCHS harnesses the power of cross-functional collaboration and shared leadership. Readers of the case will gain a comprehensive understanding of how a traditional, family-led business can successfully adapt to global trends and internal challenges. It’s a tale of strategic evolution, highlighting the delicate balance between maintaining core values and innovating to stay competitive in a fragmented world. The FUCHS case is not just a story of a company, but a blueprint for businesses facing similar global challenges, demonstrating how to win in a decentralized yet interconnected market landscape.
Reference IMD-7-2539
Copyright ©2024
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Fuchs Group
Industry Manufacturing, Chemicals
Available Languages English
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
China
Business to Business
Global Business
Strategy
Browse all topics
Root and branch: How Lionheart Agrotech is changing agribusiness from the ground up
By Benoit F. Leleux
inI by IMD19 March 2024
Summary
Three lessons from a business that is pioneering an environmentally and socially sustainable approach to coconut farming.
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Sustainability
Strategy
Browse all topics
Related content
Case StudySustainabilityEntrepreneurshipStrategySupply ChainDiversity and Equity and Inclusion
Lionheart Farms (Philippines) and the tree of lifeLionheart Agrotech Limited, the holding company of Lionheart Farms is developing a large-scale sustainable hybrid coconut plantation with integrat...
2023 Financial Times Responsible Business Education Awards - Highly Commended
By Benoit F. LeleuxAnna ZiolkovskaJose MoraSaid ChekriandThibaud de Veyrac
Case reference:IMD-7-2282©2022
Europe and Africa need an open dialogue to tackle global issues together
By Antonella Mei-Pochtler
inI by IMD13 March 2024
Summary
Africa’s entrepreneurial attitude towards innovation and citizen-centric solutions could help provide new answers to global issues that Europe also...
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Strategy
Innovation
Browse all topics
Michelin: Digital transformation and culture – where the rubber hits the road
By Didier Bonnet
inI by IMD1 March 2024
Summary
A crucial stage of Michelin’s digital transformation journey was re-engineering company culture. Engaging employees and shifting mindsets while res...
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Innovation
Strategy
Browse all topics
生成AIの戦略的な活用で競争力を高める
By Tomoko Yokoi
inHarvard Business Review JapanMarch 2024
Summary
Looking to the future and potential of generative AI (artificial intelligence), many companies are embarking on experiments and verification to int...
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Artificial Intelligence
Business Ethics
Value Creation
Strategy
Browse all topics
The CEO exodus: The imperative of strategic succession planning
By Richard Roi
inI by IMD28 February 2024
Summary
As record numbers of bosses head for the exit, early and comprehensive planning is key to navigating the complexities of CEO succession and ensurin...
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
General Management
Leadership
Strategy
Browse all topics
Il brand di famiglia sotto lo stress delle crisi relazionali
By Alfredo De MassisandCarlotta Benedetti
inIl Sole 24 ore28 February 2024
Summary
Past the blanket of gossip, the recent news of Chiara Ferragni and Fedez's marriage crisis sheds light on how negative events involving celebrities...
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Family Business
Value Creation
Strategy
Branding
Disruption
Crisis Management
Browse all topics
Henkel’s Carsten Knobel: A CEO who sticks to his strategy
By Jean-François Manzoni
inI by IMD27 February 2024
Summary
Henkel CEO Carsten Knobel tells IMD President Jean-François Manzoni why he has remained laser focused on implementing its purposeful growth agenda ...
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Leadership
Strategy
Browse all topics