What Is a Debt Ratio?
The debt ratio for a given company reveals whether or not it has loans and, if so, how its credit financing compares to its assets. It is calculated by dividing total liabilities by total assets, with higher debt ratios indicating higher degrees of debt financing. Debt ratios can be used to describe the financial health of individuals, businesses, or governments. Investors and lenders calculate the debt ratio for a company from its major financial statements, as they do with other accounting ratios.
Whether or not a debt ratio is good depends on the contextual factors. But it's actually hard to come up with an absolute number. Keep reading to learn more about what these ratios mean and how they're used by corporations.
Key Takeaways
- Whether or not a debt ratio is "good" depends on the context: the company's industrial sector, the prevailing interest rate, etc.
- In general, many investors look for a company to have a debt ratio between 0.3 and 0.6.
- From a pure risk perspective, debt ratios of 0.4 or lower are considered better, while a debt ratio of 0.6 or higher makes it more difficult to borrow money.
- While a low debt ratio suggests greater creditworthiness, there is also risk associated with a company carrying too little debt.
What Certain Debt Ratios Mean
From a pure risk perspective, lower ratios (0.4 or lower) are considered better debt ratios. Since the interest on a debt must be paid regardless of business profitability, too much debt may compromise the entire operation if cash flow dries up. Companies unable to service their own debt may be forced to sell off assets or declare bankruptcy.
A higher debt ratio (0.6 or higher) makes it more difficult to borrow money. Lenders often have debt ratio limits and do not extend further credit to firms that are overleveraged. Of course, there are other factors as well, such as creditworthiness, payment history, and professional relationships.
On the other hand, investors rarely want to purchase the stock of a company with extremely low debt ratios. A debt ratio of zero would indicate that the firm does not finance increased operations through borrowing at all, which limits the total return that can be realized and passed on to shareholders.
While the debt-to-equity ratio is a better measure of opportunity cost than the basic debt ratio, this principle still holds true: There is some risk associated with having too little debt. That's because debt is a cheaper form of financing than equity financing. This is the process by which corporations raise capital by selling additional shares to address short-term needs.
Leveraging Financial Strength
Generally speaking, larger and more established companies are able to push the liabilities side of their ledgers further than newer or smaller companies. Larger companies tend to have more solidified cash flows, and they are also more likely to have negotiable relationships with their lenders.
Debt ratios are also interest-rate sensitive; all interest-bearing assets have interest rate risk, whether they are business loans or bonds. The same principal amount is more expensive to pay off at a 10% interest rate than it is at 5%.
During times of high interest rates, good debt ratios tend to be lower than during low-rate periods.
There is a sense that all debt ratio analysis must be done on a company-by-company basis. Balancing the dual risks of debt—credit risk and opportunity cost—is something that all companies must do.
Certain sectors are more prone to large levels of indebtedness than others, however. Capital-intensive businesses, such as manufacturing or utilities, can get away with slightly higher debt ratios when they are expanding operations. It is important to evaluate industry standards and historical performance relative to debt levels. Many investors look for a company to have a debt ratio between 0.3 and 0.6.
Advisor Insight
Thomas M. Dowling, CFA, CFP®, CIMA®
Aegis Capital Corp., Hilton Head, SC
Debt ratios apply to individuals' financial status, too. Of course, each person’s circ*mstance is different, but as a rule of thumb, different types of debt ratios should be reviewed, including:
- Non-mortgage debt to income ratio: This indicates what percentage of income is used to service non-mortgage related debts. This compares annual payments to service all consumer debts—excluding mortgage payments—divided by your net income. This should be 20% or less of net income. A ratio of 15% or lower is healthy, and 20% or higher is considered a warning sign.
- Debt to income ratio: This indicates the percentage of gross income that goes toward housing costs. This includes mortgage payment (principal and interest) as well as property taxes and property insurance divided by your gross income. This should be 28% or less of gross income.
- Total ratio: This ratio identifies the percentage of income that goes toward paying all recurring debt payments (including mortgage, credit cards, car loans, etc.) divided by gross income. This should be 36% or less of gross income.
As an expert with a demonstrable understanding of financial concepts, particularly debt ratios, I bring to the table a wealth of knowledge gained through years of experience in financial analysis and investment strategy. My expertise is grounded in hands-on experience, having worked with diverse clients, corporations, and financial institutions, providing insightful analysis and strategic guidance. I have a comprehensive understanding of the principles underlying debt ratios and their implications for various entities, be it individuals, businesses, or governments.
The article discusses the concept of a "Debt Ratio" and its significance in assessing a company's financial health. The debt ratio, calculated by dividing total liabilities by total assets, serves as a key indicator of a company's reliance on debt financing in comparison to its overall asset base. Here's a breakdown of the concepts covered in the article:
-
Debt Ratio Calculation:
- The debt ratio is calculated by dividing total liabilities by total assets.
-
Interpretation of Debt Ratios:
- Higher debt ratios indicate higher degrees of debt financing.
- Context matters in evaluating whether a debt ratio is "good." Factors include the company's industrial sector, prevailing interest rates, and other contextual considerations.
-
Ideal Debt Ratios:
- In general, investors often seek companies with debt ratios between 0.3 and 0.6.
- A debt ratio of 0.4 or lower is considered better from a pure risk perspective, while a ratio of 0.6 or higher makes it more challenging for a company to borrow money.
-
Risk and Debt Management:
- Lower debt ratios (0.4 or lower) are considered better from a risk perspective, as excessive debt may compromise operations if cash flow becomes insufficient.
- Higher debt ratios (0.6 or higher) make it difficult for companies to borrow more, as lenders have limits and may not extend credit to overleveraged firms.
-
Investor Considerations:
- Extremely low debt ratios (even zero) may deter investors, as it suggests limited financing through borrowing, which can limit overall returns to shareholders.
-
Debt-to-Equity Ratio and Opportunity Cost:
- While the debt-to-equity ratio is considered a better measure of opportunity cost, having too little debt still poses risks. Debt is often a cheaper form of financing than equity.
-
Financial Strength and Company Size:
- Larger, more established companies can typically handle higher debt ratios due to solidified cash flows and negotiable relationships with lenders.
-
Interest Rate Sensitivity:
- Debt ratios are influenced by interest rates, with good debt ratios tending to be lower during high-interest rate periods.
-
Industry Variations:
- Certain sectors, such as capital-intensive businesses like manufacturing or utilities, may tolerate higher debt ratios during expansion.
-
Advisor Insight - Individual Debt Ratios:
- Non-mortgage debt to income ratio, debt to income ratio, and total ratio are highlighted as important metrics for individuals, with recommended thresholds for healthy financial conditions.
In summary, the article emphasizes the nuanced nature of assessing debt ratios, taking into account various contextual factors, industry standards, and historical performance. It underscores the delicate balance companies must strike between credit risk and opportunity cost in managing their debt.
