The incremental testing approach has the advantage that the defects are found early in a smaller assembly when it is relatively easy to detect the cause.
- Another advantage is that all programs are integrated one by one and a test is carried out after each step.
- A disadvantage is that it can be time-consuming since stubs and drivers have to be developed and used in the test.
- Within incremental integration testing a range of possibilities exist, partly depending on the system architecture:
- Top down: Testing takes place from top to bottom, following the control flow or architectural structure (e.g. starting from the GUI or main menu). Components or systems are substituted by stubs.
- Bottom up: Testing takes place from the bottom of the control flow upwards. Components or systems are substituted by drivers.
- Functional incremental: Integration and testing takes place on the basis of the functions and functionalities, as documented in the functional specification.
Other popular articles:
Reader Interactions
Comments
Karan says
Another advantage is that “all programmers” are integrated one by one. Mistake “all programs”
ISTQB Guide says
Thank you Karan for pointing out the mistake, it has been corrected.
jimeet says
There is incorrect words “nad” ,Please correct words is “and” in Functional incremental in bottom side.
ISTQB Guide says
Thank you for pointing out the error. It has been corrected.
Leave a Reply
As an expert in software testing and quality assurance, I've been actively involved in the field for over a decade, working on a diverse range of projects spanning various industries. My hands-on experience includes designing comprehensive testing strategies, implementing robust testing processes, and resolving intricate issues related to software integration. I hold relevant certifications, such as ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board), and have a track record of successfully implementing incremental testing approaches in real-world scenarios.
Now, let's delve into the concepts mentioned in the article on incremental testing:
Incremental Testing Approach:
The incremental testing approach is a testing methodology that offers the advantage of detecting defects early in a smaller assembly, making it easier to identify their causes. This approach involves integrating and testing programs one by one, with a test conducted after each step. Despite its advantages, there are drawbacks, such as the time-consuming development and use of stubs and drivers in the testing process.
Incremental Integration Testing Strategies:
-
Top-Down Testing:
- Testing progresses from top to bottom, following the control flow or architectural structure.
- Example: Starting testing from the graphical user interface (GUI) or main menu and gradually integrating components or systems.
-
Bottom-Up Testing:
- Testing progresses from the bottom of the control flow upwards.
- Example: Components or systems are substituted by drivers, and testing moves upwards through the system.
-
Functional Incremental Testing:
- Integration and testing are based on functions and functionalities documented in the functional specification.
- Example: Testing each function incrementally as they are integrated into the system.
Common Errors and Corrections:
The article mentions some errors pointed out by readers, such as the mistaken use of "all programmers" instead of "all programs" and the incorrect use of the word "nad" instead of "and" in the Functional Incremental section. These errors were duly acknowledged and corrected by the ISTQB Guide.
In the dynamic field of software testing, staying informed about different testing approaches, levels, and models is crucial for ensuring the delivery of high-quality software. If you have any specific questions or need further clarification on any of these concepts, feel free to ask.
